How many times has [2005] EWHC 1716 (Admin) been cited?

[2005] EWHC 1716 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] EWHC 1716 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“…y need will be vulnerable in this sense. The authority must also have a proper evidential basis for their decision: R (Calgin) v Enfield London Borough Council [2005] EWHC 1716 (Admin), [2006] HLR 58, para 32.…”
Cited — London Borough of Waltham Forest v Saleh 2019-11-19
“…lacement policy, such as R. (Yumsak) v Enfield London Borough Council [2002] EWHC 280 (Admin); [2003] H.L.R. 1 and R. (Calgin) v Enfield London Borough Council [2005] EWHC 1716 (Admin); [2006] H.L.R. 58, were decided.…”