How many times has [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin) been cited?

[2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Lemari Minott v Cambridge City Council 2022-02-18
“…l, can only be made by way of application for judicial review and upon public law grounds in the High Court, see, for example, R (May) v Birmingham City Council[2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin).…”
Cited — Lemari Minott v Cambridge City Council 2022-02-18
“…ich the question arose whether a purported fresh application was validly made. In addition to Fahia and Rikha Begum, they were R (May) v Birmingham City Council[2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin) (Singh J); R (Abdulrahman) v Hillingdon LBC [2016] EWHC 2647, [2017] HLR 1 (Neil Cameron QC) and R (Ibrahim) v Westminster City Council[2021] EWHC 2616 (Admin)…”