“…s were brought to the 2014 Rules, and these challenges were to the lawfulness of the rules. In R(Detention Action) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2245 (Admin) (“DA1”) the Administrative Court considered a challenge to the operation of the initial decision-making in the detained fast track. It was held that part of th…”
“…The first of such cases (“DA1”) was decided by Ouseley J on 9 July 2014: [2014] EWHC 2245 (Admin). In substance, that decided that the DFT policy guidance in place at the time, and inclusive of the appeal elements in that process, was not of itself unlawful…”
“…ss of the operation of the decision-making system in the Detained FastTrack was considered in R (Detention Action) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWHC 2245 (Admin) (“DA1”). In that case Ouseley J held that the operation of the system up until the stage of appeal was unlawful because it was unfair.…”