UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin)
[2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin)
· cited by
2
· influence score
15
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin)
The Good Law Project, R (On the Ap
Wilson & Ors , R (On the Applicati
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Electoral Commission
2019-09-17
“… application for judicial review, finding that the Commission had misinterpreted the definition of “referendum expenses” in section 111(2) of the 2000 Act: see [2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin).…”
Cited
—
Wilson & Ors , R (On the Application Of) v The Prime Minister
2019-03-04
“…[2018] EWHC 2414 (Admin); [2019] 1 All ER 365. The Commission are currently seeking to appeal that decision.…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1970] AC 567
1×
[2019] EWHC 221 (Admin)
1×