UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [2009] CAT 5
[2009] CAT 5
· cited by
3
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[2009] CAT 5
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 3
Citation network
[2009] CAT 5
British Telecommunications Plc v T
Competition and Markets Authority
Competition and Markets Authority
cited by
Cited by (3)
Cited
—
Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors
2020-05-12
“…At [81] the court “particularly” endorsed the statement of the CAT in Number (UK) Ltd v Office of Communications (Costs) [2009] CAT 5 that:…”
Cited
—
Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors
2020-05-12
“…l cases we have mentioned were inapplicable. The CAT is best placed to understand its own specific regulatory context, and will want, as was said in The Number [2009] CAT 5, to reach a consistent position.…”
Cited
—
British Telecommunications Plc v The Office of Communications
2018-11-14
“…[2009] CAT 5…”
Frequently cited alongside
[2005] CAT 20
2×
[2009] CAT 26
2×
[2013] CAT 9
2×
[2010] 1 WLR 1508
2×
[2010] EWCA Civ 40
2×
[2012] EWCA Civ 1552
2×
BPP Holdings Ltd and others v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 55
2×