UK Case Law Insights
Home
› Cases › [1913] AC 781
[1913] AC 781
· cited by
2
· influence score
13
/100
Is it still good law?
No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite
[1913] AC 781
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment
Cited · 2
Citation network
[1913] AC 781
Dwyer (UK Franchising) Limited v F
Quantum Actuarial LLP v Quantum Ad
cited by
Cited by (2)
Cited
—
Dwyer (UK Franchising) Limited v Fredbar Limited & Anor.
2022-06-30
“…[1913] AC 781…”
Cited
—
Quantum Actuarial LLP v Quantum Advisory Ltd
2021-02-24
“…ts have conflated the two (private and public interest) aspects of the test (see for example Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia v Adelaide SS Co [1913] AC 781 (at 795 per Lord Parker) and Esso (at…”
Frequently cited alongside
[1894] AC 535
2×
[1916] 1 AC 688
2×
[1920] 3 KB 571
2×
[1965] 1 WLR 1366
2×
[1968] AC 269
2×
[1974] 1 WLR 1308
2×
[1976] 1 WLR 1187
2×
[1991] IRLR 214
2×