How many times has [1932] AC 328 been cited?

[1932] AC 328 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1932] AC 328

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1932] AC 328

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Glencore Energy UK Ltd & Anor v Freeport Holdings Ltd (The 'Lady M') 2019-03-14
“…mber of authorities on the correct approach to the interpretation of the Hague Rules by the English Courts. These included: Stag Line v. Foscolo, Mango & Co Ltd[1932] AC 328, Lord Atkin at 342-3 and Lord MacMillan at 350; Aktieelskabet de Danske Sukkerfabriker v. Bajamar Compania Naviera S.A. (The Torenia)[1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 210, …”
Cited — Bakhshiyeva (Foreign Representative of the Ojsc International Bank of Azerbaijan) v Sberbank of Russia & Ors 2018-12-18
“…l acceptation”, and its “interpretation should not be rigidly controlled by domestic precedents of antecedent date”: see Stag Line v Foscolo Mango & Co Limited [1932] AC 328 (“Stag Line”) at 350, per Lord Macmillan, and the observations to similar effect of Lord Wilberforce in James Buchanan & Co Limited v Babco Forwarding & Shippi…”
Cited — Sea Tank Shipping AS v Vinnlustodin HF Vatryggingafelag Islands FH 2018-02-22
“…n mind that the Hague Rules had and (where they are still applicable) have an international currency. As Lord Macmillan said in Stag Line v Foscolo, Mango & Co [1932] AC 328 at 350:…”