How many times has [1940] AC 701 been cited?

[1940] AC 701 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1940] AC 701

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1940] AC 701

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Followed · 1

Cited — Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd 2018-10-18
“…In Southern Foundries 1926 Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 Lord Atkin preferred not to characterise this as an implied term but as “a positive rule of the law of contract that conduct of either promisor or promisee whi…”
Followed — Ukraine v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc (Rev 1) 2018-09-14
“… Mr Thanki relied upon the following statement of Cockburn CJ in Stirling v Maitland (1864) 5 B&S 841, 852 (approved in Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701, 717, 730 and 741):…”