- Applied — Phillip Gwyn James Evans v Barclays Bank PLC & Ors 2023-11-09
“… argue that the decision is inadmissible but alternatively of strictly limited, if any, probative value. It is contended that the rule in Hollington v Hewthorn [1943] KB 587 (“Hollington”) applies to the findings in the decision, rendering it inadmissible. I do not agree. I address below first whether the decision is admissible and…”
- Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…it decides will be res judicata or give rise to issue estoppel in this action. Mr Choo Choy submitted that in accordance with the rule in Hollington v Hewthorn [1943] KB 587 any factual findings in the 155bn CPA would be inadmissible in proceedings in the present action. That is not true of findings of Brazilian law, and there are …”
- Applied — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v BTI 2014 LLC 2021-01-11
“…ot even be admissible in evidence at the second trial: see per Sir Andrew Morritt V-C in Bairstow at [15]-[27] applying the principles of Hollington v Hewthorn [1943] KB 587 to civil proceedings.…”
- Cited — Gray v Global Energy Horizons Corporation 2020-12-09
“…y Cooke J in the unrelated case of Gray v JMPC Sales Ltd [2013] EWHC 4136, as it offended against the principle established in Hollington v F Hewthorn & Co Ltd [1943] KB 587. While we think that Asplin J was probably wrong in this respect, just as Cooke J himself had probably been wrong to take account of Vos J’s criticisms, Mr Dut…”
- Cited — Shagang Shipping Company Ltd v HNA Group Company Ltd 2018-07-23
“…r Xu’s conviction by a Chinese criminal court was itself evidence that the bribe had been paid, notwithstanding the exclusionary rule in Hollington v. Hewthorn [1943] KB 587.…”