How many times has [1950] 2 All E.R. 1064 been cited?

[1950] 2 All E.R. 1064 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1950] 2 All E.R. 1064

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Followed · 2

Followed — Giannis Ntzegkoutanis v Georgios Kimonis & Ors 2023-12-12
“…The classic definition of the rule in Foss v. Harbottle is stated in the judgment of Jenkins LJ in Edwards v. Halliwell [1950] 2 All E.R. 1064 as follows … (1) The proper plaintiff in an action in respect of a wrong alleged to be done to a corporation is, prima facie, the corporation….”…”
Followed — Lawrence Ewan McGaughey & Anor v Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited & Ors 2023-07-21
“…“The classic definition of the rule in Foss v. Harbottle is stated in the judgment of Jenkins L.J. in Edwards v. Halliwell [1950] 2 All E.R. 1064 as follows. (1) The proper plaintiff in an action in respect of a wrong alleged to be done to a corporation is, prima facie, the corporation. (2) Where the all…”