How many times has [1950] AC 361 been cited?

[1950] AC 361 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1950] AC 361

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1950] AC 361

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — The Pensions Ombudsman v CMG Pension Trustees Limited & Anor 2023-11-01
“…ed by Arnold J’s decision. In addition, it seems to me that Arnold J’s conclusion did form part of the ratio of the decision. See Jacobs v LondonCounty Council [1950] AC 361 per Lord Simonds at 369 and the approach adopted by Leggatt LJ (as he then was) inR (Youngsam) v Parole Board [2020] QB 387 at [51].…”
Cited — Youngsam, R (on the application of) v The Parole Board & Anor 2019-02-27
“…ifest that the judge would still have reached the same conclusion even if that ruling were reversed. As Lord Simonds observed in Jacobs v London County Council [1950] AC 361, 369:…”