How many times has [1952] 2 QB 100 been cited?

[1952] 2 QB 100 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1952] 2 QB 100

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1952] 2 QB 100

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Applied · 1Cited · 1

Applied — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…In Tyman’s Ltd v Craven [1952] 2 QB 100 a company purported to apply to the county court for the grant of a new tenancy during the period of its dissolution. The hearing was adjourned, and before the…”
Cited — Bridgehouse (Bradford No. 2) Ltd v BAE Systems Plc 2020-06-16
“…Craven [1952] 2 QB 100, Hodson LJ concluded at 126 that the words of section 353(6) of the Companies Act 1948 (the second half of which corresponded to the later section 653(3) of th…”