“…Waller LJ, in the majority, referred to Johnson v Johnson [1952] P 47 at pp. 50-51 and In re Nanaimo Community Hotel Ltd [1944] 4 DLR 638. He said:…”
“…the meaning of the phrase was given by McFarlane J in In re Nanaimo Community Hotel Ltd. [1944] 4 DLR 638. It was adopted by Somervell LJ in Johnson v. Johnson [1952] P 47, 50–51. It may be that in some contexts the substitution of the words “having to do with” will solve the entire problem which is created by the use of the word…”
“…nt even if it is uncertain whether that event will ever happen. That is illustrated in a context that is far removed from the present one. In Johnson v Johnson [1952] P 47 the question was whether a commissioner had power to give leave to present a divorce petition before three years had elapsed from the date of the marriage. Und…”