“…the current lease is not limited to the security of tenure of the tenant even in the extended sense referred to by Denning L.J. in Gold v. Brighton Corporation [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1291. There must, in my view, be a good reason based in the absence of agreement on essential fairness for the court to impose a new term not in the current lease b…”
“…ng to introduce new, or substituted, or modified terms, to justify the change, with reasons appearing sufficient to the court (see Gold v. Brighton Corporation [1956] 1 W.L.R. 1291, 1294 - on ‘strong and cogent evidence’ per Denning L.J., Cardshops Ltd. v. Davies [1971] 1 W.L.R. 591, 596 per Widgery L.J.).”…”