How many times has [1956] A.C. 736 been cited?

[1956] A.C. 736 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1956] A.C. 736

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1956] A.C. 736

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Braithwaite and Melton Meadows Properties Limited, R (on the application of) v East Suffolk Council 2022-12-21
“…decision issued by a public authority is legally valid until quashed by the court(see the speech of Lord Radcliffe in Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council [1956] A.C. 736, at pp.769 and 770, and the judgment of Lord Reed in R. (on the application of Majera) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 46; [2022] A.C.…”
Cited — Croke v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor 2019-02-01
“… could not reasonably have been expected to be aware of it, the six-week time limit has been held to be absolute (see Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council [1956] A.C. 736, Routh v Reading Corporation (1970) 217…”