How many times has [1959] 2 QB 311 been cited?

[1959] 2 QB 311 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1959] 2 QB 311

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1959] 2 QB 311

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Considered · 1

Cited — United Trade Action Group Limited (R on the application of) v Transport for London 2022-07-22
“…Prior to the era of the smartphone app the leading case on plying for hire was Cogley v Sherwood [1959] 2 QB 311, the decision of an exceptionally strong Divisional Court consisting of Lord Parker CJ, Donovan J and Salmon J (the Lord Chief Justice and two future Lords of …”
Considered — United Trade Action Group Limited (R on the application of) v Transport for London 2022-07-22
“…sue of principle in this case has not previously been considered by this Court. It seems to me that the essential principle was summarised in Cogley v Sherwood [1959] 2 QB 311, at 331, by Salmon J:…”