“…e in the sense in which it is false”: see Goose v Wilson Sandford & Co [2001] Lloyd’s Rep PN 189, at paragraph 41, per Morritt LJ. Thus, in Akerhielm v De Mare [1959] AC 789, Lord Jenkins, giving the judgment of the Privy Council, said at 805:…”
“…ide how the normal rule, that, for a finding of fraud, the representor must have intended to make a representation he knew to be false (see Akerhielm v De Mare [1959] AC 789, 804 per Lord Jenkins, Gross v Lewis Hillman Ltd [1970] Ch 445 per Cross LJ and Raiffeisen v RBS [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 123 paragraphs 338-340 per Christopher C…”