How many times has [1961] A.C. 636 been cited?

[1961] A.C. 636 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1961] A.C. 636

· cited by 2 · influence score 18/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1961] A.C. 636

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Hook v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor (Rev 1) 2020-04-03
“…P. & C.R. 263, at pp.271 and 272). An agricultural occupancy condition is acceptable in principle (see Fawcett Properties Ltd. v Buckinghamshire County Council [1961] A.C. 636), and may be imposed on a retrospective planning permission (see ex parte Grimes, at p.319). The council, having suggested the condition, plainly regarded it a…”
Cited — Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs 2018-09-21
“…The principles relevant to the interpretation of planning conditions are well established. In Fawcett Properties Ltd. v Buckinghamshire County Council [1961] A.C. 636, Lord Denning said (on p.678) said it was “the daily task of the courts to resolve ambiguities of language and to choose between them; and to construe words so…”