- Cited — Industrial Cleaning Equipment (Southampton) Limited v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment Holdings Co Ltd & Anor 2023-12-06
“…Supreme Court has power to depart from one of its own precedents or of one of the House of Lords in accordance with the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234: see section 6(5A) of the 2018 Act and the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Relevant Court) (Retained EU Case Law) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1525).…”
- Cited — Raffaele Mincione v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A 2022-04-29
“…[1966] 1 WLR 1234 …”.…”
- Cited — Tunein Inc v Warner Music UK Ltd & Anor 2021-03-26
“…Supreme Court has power to depart from one of its own precedents or of one of the House of Lords in accordance with the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234: section 6(5A) of the 2018 Act and the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Relevant Court) (Retained EU Case Law) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1525).…”
- Applied — Quantum Actuarial LLP v Quantum Advisory Ltd 2021-02-24
“…Applying the facility inherited under Practice Statement (HL:Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234, the Supreme Court departed from the previous well-known decision of the House of Lords in Esso Petroleum Ltd v Harper's Garage Southport [1968] AC 269 ("Esso"…”
- Cited — Swift v Carpenter & Anor 2020-10-09
“…[1966] 1 WLR 1234,…”
- Cited — Swift v Carpenter & Anor 2020-10-09
“…The Supreme Court then proceeded to correct the injustice they had identified by the application of the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234.…”
- Cited — Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust 2018-08-03
“…d the Supreme Court decided to depart from its previous decision in Gray in a material respect in accordance with the House of Lords 1966 Practice Statement at [1966] 1 WLR 1234.…”
- Cited — Garcia v Marex Financial Ltd 2018-06-26
“… that court may depart from what otherwise have been a binding decision of its own (or of the House of Lords) under the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234. But that is not an option open to this Court.…”
- Cited — WB v W District Council 2018-04-26
“…) [1966] 1 WLR 1234)…”
- Not followed — WB v W District Council 2018-04-26
“…persuade the Supreme Court to depart from the previous decision of the House of Lords as it is entitled to do under the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234. However, that is not enough to enable this court to refuse to follow an otherwise binding decision of the House of Lords unless it can be said that subsequent…”
- Cited — DN (Rwanda) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-02-22
“…which individuals can rely in the conduct of their affairs, as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules." Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234.…”