“…fraudulent agent acting for a company or firm. That is true of the two earlier cases about rubber companies: Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3)[1968] 1 WLR 1555 (Ungoed Thomas J) and Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)[1972] 1 WLR 602 (Brightman J); it is true of Lipkin Gorman, which involved the solicitor with gamblin…”
“…sually no possibility of a proprietary remedy; they are ‘nothing more than a formula for equitable relief’: Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555 at 1582.…”
“…ther the payment requested by the authorised signatory to the account really should be made: see Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock and others (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555 and Groves Raffin Construction Ltd and another v Bank of Nova Scotia [1976] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 374. She drew from these cases that the Quincecare duty is at its hea…”