How many times has [1968] 1 WLR 519 been cited?

[1968] 1 WLR 519 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1968] 1 WLR 519

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1968] 1 WLR 519

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford & Ors. 2023-02-17
“… by GBRK for the freehold appeared to be more than its market value: see [265]. Nor was there any scope for operation of the principle in Protheroe v Protheroe [1968] 1 WLR 519 (CA): see [266].…”
Cited — Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford & Ors. 2023-02-17
“…ad acquired the freehold of the Site in 2016, an application of the strict equitable rule in Keech v Sandford (1726) Sel. Case. Ch 61 and Protheroe v Protheroe [1968] 1 WLR 519 (CA) would have resulted in Greenbox acquiring the freehold as trustee. It was not open to Mr. Monks and GBRK to escape the operation of that rule by (a) causi…”