How many times has [1969] 1 WLR 1266 been cited?

[1969] 1 WLR 1266 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1969] 1 WLR 1266

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1969] 1 WLR 1266

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — British Pregnancy Advisory Service, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2020-03-10
“…be given effect, unless ‘that meaning leads to some result which cannot reasonably be supposed to have been the intention of the legislature’ (Pinner v Everett [1969] 1 WLR 1266 at 1273, per Lord Reid). That is not the case here.”…”
Cited — British Pregnancy Advisory Service, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2020-03-10
“…The judge erred in his approach to the natural and ordinary meaning of section 1(1)(a). In Pinner v Everett [1969] 1 WLR 1266, Lord Reid at page 1273D stated:…”