- Followed — Helen Timson, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-06-09
“…not of course follow that a duty of prior consultation will arise in every case. The basic principle was stated by Lord Reid 40 years ago in Wiseman v Borneman [1971] AC 297, 308, in terms which are consistent with the ordinary rules for the construction of statutes and remain good law:…”
- Followed — Ofsted v The Secretary of State for Education 2018-12-21
“… the process to be followed that is a factor which militates strongly against the Courts adding another layer of process – see, for example, Wiseman v Borneman [1971] AC 297 per Lord Reid at 308 ; R (Hillingdon LBC v Lord Chancellor [2008] EWHC 2683 (Admin) per Dyson LJ at [37]-[38], and R (Buckinghamshire County Council) v Kingsto…”
- Cited — Ofsted v The Secretary of State for Education 2018-12-21
“…cknowledged by Ofsted that it will “learn from complaints to improve the way we work and how our staff carry out their roles”. Cases such as Wiseman v Borneman [1971] AC 297 (which concerned whether natural justice required that there be an oral hearing of a determination by a tax tribunal of whether there was a prima facie case); …”
- Cited — Neumans LLP v The Solicitors Regulation Authority 2018-03-02
“…ons, especially when these do provide for an opportunity to be heard, albeit not at the stage which the individual would have preferred: see Wiseman v Borneman [1971] AC 297; Pearlberg v Varty [1972] 2 All ER 6.…”
- Cited — Miller & Anor v The Health Service Commissioner for England 2018-02-15
“…r relevant material (supportive or adverse to their case) without giving the affected person the right to comment upon it (see, for example: Wiseman v Boardman [1971] AC 297 per Lord Morris at 309, R v London Borough of Camden ex p Paddock [1995] COD 130 per Sedley J and R v Chelsea College of Art & Design ex p Nash [2000] ELR 686 …”