“…be sufficient; liability under English law also would need to be established in accordance with the test of double actionability recognised in Boys -v- Chaplin [1971] AC 356, [1969] 2 All ER 1085, But if that test is satisfied, then it is immaterial whether a right of contribution between the tortfeasors exists under any foreign la…”
“…ere involved and - after applying the relevant provisions of English and Ruritanian law in accordance with the principles explained in Boys -v- Chaplin (supra, [1971] AC 356) - reached the conclusion that two (say, B and C) were liable to the third (A) in respect of the same damage, it would, in my view, not only be conceivable but…”