How many times has [1974] 1 WLR 1514 been cited?

[1974] 1 WLR 1514 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1974] 1 WLR 1514

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1974] 1 WLR 1514

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Blacklion Law LLP v Amira Nature Foods Ltd & Anor 2023-06-15
“…ils, which is a question of law. In those circumstances the court is not bound by one party's concession (Bahamas International Property Trust Ltd v Threadgold [1974] 1 WLR 1514, where a point was raised for the first time in the House of Lords), or the positions taken by the parties on a question of interpretation (Teesside Gas Transp…”
Cited — Lee Hudson v Jayne Hathway 2022-12-14
“…ils, which is a question of law. In those circumstances the court is not bound by one party’s concession (Bahamas International Property Trust Ltd v Threadgold [1974] 1 WLR 1514, where a point was raised for the first time in the House of Lords), or the positions taken by the parties on a question of interpretation (Teesside Gas Transp…”