“…conscience of the “true” owner. The claim is a “mere equity”. It is to be satisfied by the minimum award necessary to do justice (Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch 179, 198), which may sometimes lead to no more than a monetary award. A “common intention” constructive trust, by contrast, is identifying the true beneficial owne…”
“…no more: see [47]. Such an approach accords with Scarman LJ’s reference to “the minimum equity to do justice to the plaintiff” in Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] Ch. 179, 198, and with nineteenth-century cases such as Plimmer v Wellington Corporation (1884) 9 App. Cas. 699, where Sir Arthur Hobhouse said at 714:…”