“…es in question so that the alleged beneficiaries would acquire a beneficial interest. No particular formality is required. The leading case is Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527, where the Court of Appeal upheld the judge’s conclusion that the words ‘the money is as much yours as mine’ were sufficient to create a trust on the facts of …”
“…Although the judge described the law on this point as uncontroversial and cited the leading authority of Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527, counsel for Mr Gill submitted that the judge had misapplied the principle established by that decision. In that case Mr Constance was a fitter. He was married…”
“…Although an intention to create a trust does not require the use of the word trust or similar language, there must be, as Scarman LJ said in Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527 at 531, “a clear declaration of trust and that means there must be clear evidence from what is said or done of an intention to create a trust”. For the reasons…”