- Cited — William Andrew Tinkler v Esken Limited (formerly Stobart Group Limited) 2023-06-09
“… for Hamilton were obiter. Moreover, the hurdle of materiality which enables a party to defeat a final judgment must be set high (see the Ampthill Peerage Case [1977] AC 547 per Lord Wilberforce at page 569D-E). Even if the judge was right to think that in this case there was no practical difference between the formulations (which …”
- Cited — Rasal Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima & Ors 2023-05-15
“…am said in Johnson v Gore Wood. He emphasised that there is a common thread of finality. He relied upon what Lord Wilberforce said in The Ampthill Peerage Case [1977] AC 547 at 569 (cited with approval most recently by Marcus Smith J giving the main judgment of the Court of Appeal in Allsop v Banner Jones [2021] EWCA Civ 7; [2022] …”
- Cited — Al-Siri, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-02-08
“…the Ladd v Marshall test, and the principle of finality to which it gives effect (described as “a general rule of high importance” in the Ampthill Peerage Case [1977] AC 547), are broadly applicable, by analogy, in the public law context (including immigration cases). In R (Momin Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1…”
- Followed — Allsop v Banner Jones Ltd (t/a Banner Jones Solicitors) 2021-01-08
“…Res judicata estoppel has as its rationale the importance of finality in judicial decision-making. In The Ampthill Peerage Case, [1977] AC 547 at 569, Lord Wilberforce put the point as follows:…”
- Cited — Point West GR Ltd v Bassi & Ors 2020-06-24
“…ght of the important principle of finality in dispute resolution. That principle was endorsed in ringing tones by Lord Wilberforce in The Ampthill Peerage case [1977] AC 547, 569:…”