- Cited — Amir Soleymani v Nifty Gateway LLC 2022-10-06
“…o the contrary were these. First Nifty reminded the Court of the limited basis on which an appellate court will interfere with an exercise of discretion (G v G [1985] 1 WLR 647 at 652D-E). The Judge’s conclusion was right or, at its lowest, within the range of reasonable responses available and so this Court should not interfere. Nift…”
- Cited — H-N And Others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) (Rev 2) 2021-03-30
“…[1985] 1 WLR 647…”
- Considered — Sutton v Norwich City Council 2021-01-13
“…ion, an appellate Court or Tribunal is not entitled to interfere merely because it might have come to a different conclusion. In G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647, Lord Fraser said at 652 that an appellate Court should interfere with an exercise of discretion only if it considers that the judge of first instance “has not…”
- Considered — Cable v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd 2020-07-31
“… into account a feature which should not have been considered, or failed to balance the various factors fairly in the scale: see G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647 and AEI Rediffusion Music Limited v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507.…”
- Considered — Chapelgate Credit Opportunity Master Fund Ltd v Money & Ors 2020-02-25
“…and Mr Bacon each maintained that there was no basis for interfering with the judge’s exercise of discretion. In this connection, Mr Bacon referred us to G v G [1985] 1 WLR 647 to remind us that an appellate Court “should only interfere when they consider that the judge of first instance has not merely preferred an imperfect solution …”
- Cited — The London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown (Rev 3) 2020-01-21
“…G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647 at 642, where Lord Fraser of Tullybelton said:…”
- Cited — Prescott v Potamianos & Anor 2019-06-06
“…quoting Lord Fraser of Tullybelton in G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647, as quoted by Brooke LJ in Tanfern Ltd. v Cameron-MacDonald (Practice Note) [2000] 1 WLR 1311, 1317, in turn quoted by Clarke LJ (as he then was) in Assicurazi…”
- Cited — Kelly v Pyres 2018-06-14
“…llate court interfering or substituting its own view in cases of this nature. In particular he refers to the paradigm case of G v G [1985] 2 All ER 225 at 228; [1985] 1 WLR 647 at 651 and Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 FLR 1360 together with in Re N (Residents: hopeless appeals) [1995] 2 FLR 230 where Ward LJ said:…”
- Cited — Canal & River Trust v Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2018-03-02
“…ment of Brooke LJ in Tanfern Ltd v Cameron-MacDonald (Practice Note), [2000] 1 WLR 13, 11, at paragraph 32, citing Lord Fraser in G v G (Minors:Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647, 652.…”