How many times has [1985] 2 All ER 225 been cited?

[1985] 2 All ER 225 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1985] 2 All ER 225

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1985] 2 All ER 225

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — The Good Law Project (R on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2022-03-24
“…the cogency of the conclusion and which takes the decision outwith the generous ambit within which a reasonable disagreement is possible (see for example G v G [1985] 2 All ER 225; [1985] 1 WLR at 652 E-F and Prescott v Potaminanos (Re Sprintroom Ltd) [2019] EWCA Civ 932; [2019] BCC 1031 at [76]).…”
Cited — Kelly v Pyres 2018-06-14
“…urt of the danger of an appellate court interfering or substituting its own view in cases of this nature. In particular he refers to the paradigm case of G v G [1985] 2 All ER 225 at 228; [1985] 1 WLR 647 at 651 and Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 FLR 1360 together with in Re N (Residents: hopeless appeals) [1995] 2 FLR 230 where Ward LJ …”