Is it still good law? ⚠️ This case has negative treatment (1 citation(s): e.g. doubted / not followed / overruled). Check carefully before relying on it.
How to cite
(1985) 7 EHRR 471
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
“…in R (Aguilar Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45; [2012] 1 AC 621to overrule Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471). For those reasons, I consider that the provisions of Dublin III do not individually mirror the obligations imposed by article 8.…”
“…with a substantive right. Citing authority going back to Abdulaziz, Cabalesand Balkandali v United Kingdom (ECtHR Application Nos 9214/80, 9473/81 and 9474/81) (1985) 7 EHRR 471 at [71], in Stec v United Kingdom (ECtHR Application Nos 65731/01 and 65900/01) (2005) 41 EHRR SE18 at [38] the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR put it this way:…”
“…very weighty reasons are required to justify any discrimination connected to, or resulting from, sex (see eg Abdulaziz and others v UK (1985) 7 EHRR 471).…”