How many times has [1985] AC 97 been cited?

[1985] AC 97 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1985] AC 97

· cited by 2 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1985] AC 97

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Approved · 2

Approved — Boys & Maugham (a firm) v Moore 2020-12-17
“…of Mr Moore for committal. Again, the law is very clearly established. It can be found among other places in the judgment of Lord Diplock in Isaacs v Robertson [1985] AC 97 at 101 approving the passage of Romer LJ in Hadkinson v Hadkinson [1052] P 285 at 288:…”
Approved — Mazhar v The Lord Chancellor 2019-10-02
“…ders about which of Mr Brent complained had actually been set aside he was required to obey them. That reflected the well-known principle in Isaacs v Robertson [1985] AC 97, approving (at pp. 101-102) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Hadkinson v Hadkinson [1952] P 285.…”