How many times has [1989] 1 AC 1280 been cited?

[1989] 1 AC 1280 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1989] 1 AC 1280

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1989] 1 AC 1280

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Motorola Solutions, Inc & Anor v Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) 2021-01-11
“…ecessary to attract without prejudice privilege was that negotiations must be “genuinely aimed at settlement” (see Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1989] 1 AC 1280). He described Hawick Jersey Ltd v Caplan as a clear case of an improper threat, but added an important note of caution:…”
Cited — BGC Brokers LP & Ors v Tradition (UK) Ltd & Ors 2019-11-18
“…o protected from inspection by other parties in the same litigation, whether or not a settlement was concluded: see Rush & Tomkins Ltd v Greater London Council [1989] 1 AC 1280 at 1300, 1305 (Lord Griffiths).…”