“…ll words or phrases used to widen, rather than narrow, that which is being described or referred to (see, for example, Ashville Investments v Elmer Contractors [1989] QB 488, C.A. about the width of the expression ‘in connection with’).…”
“…The words “in connection with” are “words of the widest import” – per Balcombe LJ in Ashville Investments Ltd v Elmer [1989] QB 488 at p503D. It denotes “any link at all” – per Coulson J in Amec Group v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2010] EWHC 419 (TCC) at [29].…”