- Cited — Blacklion Law LLP v Amira Nature Foods Ltd & Anor 2023-06-15
“…. . . The first is that the point is a pure point of law. In Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 Nourse LJ said:…”
- Cited — Bilal Ali (as personal representative of Farzand Ali (Deceased)) v Laith Khatib (as personal representative of Fateh Bubu (Deceased)) & Ors. 2022-04-08
“…n agreed, referred to several cases illustrating the approach of the courts to the exercise of discretion in such circumstances. The first was Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605. It was concerned with an application by the landlord appellants to withdraw a legal concession made at first instance and to amend their grounds of appeal to …”
- Considered — UK Learning Academy Ltd v Secretary of State for Education 2020-03-11
“…which a party will be permitted to advance a case for the first time on appeal have been considered in numerous authorities; see, for example, Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 at 611 per Nourse LJ, Jones v MBNA International Bank Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 514, Singh v Dass [2019] EWCA Civ 360 at [15] – [18] per Haddon-Cave LJ. Where the ne…”
- Cited — The Competition And Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd & Ors 2019-10-04
“…ew issue is one of law, as opposed to being contingent upon facts or evidence, the court is more likely to grant permission: See for instance, Pitallis v Grant [1989] QB 605 at page [611C-F]; and Preedy v Dunne [2016] EWCA Civ 805 at paragraphs [43] and [44]. In this case the point sought to be raised is not one of evidence. The ev…”
- Cited — Notting Hill Finance Ltd v Sheikh 2019-07-25
“…appellate court to the question of whether to permit a new point to be taken on appeal. That statement appears in the judgment of Nourse LJ in Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 at page 611,…”
- Cited — Golding v Martin 2019-03-15
“…force in that contention. But there are two reasons why we would reject that objection. The first is that the point is a pure point of law. In Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 Nourse LJ said:…”
- Cited — Rana v London Borough of Ealing & Anor 2018-09-25
“…The most well-known statement of this Court’s approach to allowing a point to be taken for the first time on appeal is in Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605. We were not in fact referred to Pittalis; but we were referred to Glatt v Sinclair [2013] EWCA Civ 241, [2013] 1 WLR 3602, which quotes the relevant passage f…”
- Cited — Eurasia Sports Ltd v Aguad 2018-07-24
“…Both sides referred to Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 (relied on post CPR by this court in Glatt v Sinclair [2013] EWCA Civ 241) on the approach to allowing an appellant to take a new point on an appeal. In Pittal…”
- Followed — WB v W District Council 2018-04-26
“…In Pittalis v Grant [1989] QB 605 the Court of Appeal was required to decide whether to follow a decision of the House of Lords to the effect that a point of law could not be taken in appeal fr…”