How many times has [1990] 1 AC 605 been cited?

[1990] 1 AC 605 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1990] 1 AC 605

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1990] 1 AC 605

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Approved · 1

Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v Charles (t/a Boston Computer Group Europe) 2019-12-10
“…in the UT or FTT (Tax Chamber) rules it is stated that by not disclosing the error in the Visit Report, the three-stage test in Caparo Industries Ltd v Dickman [1990] 1 AC 605 is met (paragraphs 28 and 30).…”
Approved — The Commissioners for HMRC v Charles (t/a Boston Computer Group Europe) 2019-12-10
“…He then went on to remind himself of the incremental test approved by Lord Bridge in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 1 AC 605, 618 to the effect that it is preferable that the law should develop novel categories of negligence incrementally and by analogy with established categories.…”