“…a justified finding of fact. It is well-established that the contempt jurisdiction is not to be used as a means of providing compensation (see Johnson v Walton [1990] 1 FLR 350 at 353). There is no obvious relevance of Mr Deripaska’s alleged breaches to any ongoing proceedings between the parties in Jersey;…”
“…tion may be lost after lengthy, and even wrongful, absence. However, that was rightly not an issue before Cohen J. It is well-established (see Johnson v Walton [1990] 1 FLR 350 at 352D) that orders are to be obeyed and that arguments about whether they should or should not have been granted are no excuse for disobedience.…”