“…ate by the official receiver or an appointed trustee, and to protect unsecured creditors: Harlow DC v Hall [2006] EWCA 156 at [17], citing Smith v Braintree DC [1990] 2 AC 215 at 230 per Lord Jauncey. I agree, but I do not see how this assists MWP.…”
“…ority that the IA 1986 should be construed as a piece of new legislation and without regard to the predecessor provisions: see for example Smith v Braintree DC [1990] 2 AC 215 at 238B per Lord Jauncey where he said this about s. 285 itself.…”