- Cited — M (Children : Habitual Residence : 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention) 2020-08-25
“…tention, is consonant with the modern international concept”. This analysis derived from Lord Brandon’s speech in In re J (A Minor) (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1990] 2 AC 562 in which he made a third preliminary point, at p 578H, namely that “there is a significant difference between a person ceasing to be habitually resident in cou…”
- Cited — M (Children : Habitual Residence : 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention) 2020-08-25
“…ere it minded to remove any gloss from the domestic concept of habitual residence (such as, I interpolate, Lord Brandon's third preliminary point in the J case [1990] 2 AC 562), the court should strive not to introduce others. A gloss is a purported sub-rule which distorts application of the rule. The identification of a child's habi…”
- Cited — I-L (Children) (1996 Hague Child Protection Convention : Inherent Jurisdiction) 2019-11-15
“…ere it minded to remove any gloss from the domestic concept of habitual residence (such as, I interpolate, Lord Brandon's third preliminary point in the J case [1990] 2 AC 562), the court should strive not to introduce others. A gloss is a purported sub-rule which distorts application of the rule. The identification of a child's habi…”
- Cited — G-E (Children : Hague Convention 1980: Repudiatory Retention and Habitual Residence) 2019-03-01
“…ere it minded to remove any gloss from the domestic concept of habitual residence (such as, I interpolate, Lord Brandon’s third preliminary point in the J case [1990] 2 AC 562), the court should strive not to introduce others. A gloss is a purported sub-rule which distorts application of the rule. The identification of a child’s habi…”