“…stions (or Protocol questions) which could have the effect of expanding the ordinary meaning of the claim: see Improver Corpn v Remington Consumer Products Ltd [1990] FSR 181. The construction of a written instrument is a commonplace in our courts. Despite the differences between patents and contracts, the underlying principles are …”
“…In Improver v Remington [1990] FSR 181 Hoffmann J (as he then was) analysed the speech of Lord Diplock in Catnic and formulated three questions the court should ask itself in order to determine whet…”