How many times has [1994] 1 AC 438 been cited?

[1994] 1 AC 438 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1994] 1 AC 438

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1994] 1 AC 438

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Ins Assoc Ltd v Kingdom of Spain 2021-11-04
“…ve repeatedly deprecated “prolonged debate and consideration of the merits of the plaintiffs’ claim” (Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran[1994] 1 AC 438 at 455G; Altimo Holdings at [84] and [85]). More recently, the Supreme Court has emphasised that an appellate court should be slow to interfere with a decision…”
Cited — Al Jaber & Anor v Al Ibrahim & Anor 2018-07-18
“…The last provision reflects the three-limb test for service out of the jurisdiction set out in Seaconsar Far East Ltd v. Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1994] 1 AC 438 (HL) and VTB Capital Plc v. Nutritek International Corporation [2013] 2 AC 387, Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony at [164]. On an application for permission to se…”