“…the claimant must have been “targeted” or “aimed at”. In my opinion the majority of the Court of Appeal was wrong to have allowed the action in Millar v Bassey [1994] EMLR 44 to proceed. Miss Bassey had broken her contract to perform for the recording company and it was a foreseeable consequence that the recording company would have…”
“…rom merely being the foreseen or intended consequence. The joint venture was in no sense “aimed at” the Service Agreement or “targeting” it. In Millar v Bassey [1994] EMLR 44 the foreseeable consequence of Ms Bassey’s breach of contract with the recording company was that the recording company would have to break its contracts with …”