- Cited — B (Secure Accommodation Order), Re (Rev 1) 2019-11-21
“…For nearly 25 years, however, since the decision of this court in Re M (SecureAccommodation Order) [1995] Fam 108, it has been accepted that the child’s welfare is not paramount when deciding an application under s.25. There remains, however, some uncertainty as to the ext…”
- Cited — B (Secure Accommodation Order), Re (Rev 1) 2019-11-21
“…“must” (SSW(W)A 2014, s.119(4)), make a secure accommodation order (see Re M (Secure Accommodation) [1995] Fam 108).”…”
- Cited — B (Secure Accommodation Order), Re (Rev 1) 2019-11-21
“…iples in the Convention (see to this effect per Baroness Hale in Re B [2015] UKSC 33 at paragraph [194]). To the extent that the judgment of Hoffman LJ in Re M [1995] Fam 108 (set out extensively in the judgment of Baker LJ above at paragraphs [65ff]), suggests that the role of the judge is to put him/her self in the position of the…”
- Applied — M (A Child) (Secure Accommodation) 2018-12-06
“…In In Re M (Secure Accommodation Order) [1995] Fam 108, this court confirmed that the welfare paramountcy principle in Section 1 does not apply to a Section 25 application, although a local authority should conside…”
- Cited — T (A Child) 2018-10-04
“…tisfied and, if so (CA 1989, s 25(4)) the court “shall”, or “must” (SSW(W)A 2014, s 119(4)), make a secure accommodation order (see Re M (Secure Accommodation) [1995] Fam 108).…”