How many times has [1996] 1 AC 155 been cited?

[1996] 1 AC 155 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1996] 1 AC 155

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1996] 1 AC 155

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Saffron Paul v The Paul Wolverhampton NHS Trust 2022-01-13
“…[1996] 1 AC 155 (…”
Cited — Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation 2019-04-17
“…was of long term rather than traumatic injury is in our view neither here nor there: Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837; Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155.…”