How many times has [1996] 1 FLR 80 been cited?

[1996] 1 FLR 80 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1996] 1 FLR 80

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1996] 1 FLR 80

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — Y & Anor (1996 Hague Convention: Article 11), Re 2023-07-12
“…s: Standard of Proof) [2009] UKSC 17, [2010] 1 AC 678, [2010] 1 FLR 1161 (citing Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563, [1996] 2 WLR 8, [1996] 1 FLR 80 that:…”
Cited — RE A (CHILDREN) (POOL OF PERPETRATORS) 2022-10-17
“…d uncertain, has become clear and well established, and bearing in mind the words of Lord Lloyd (Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563, [1996] 1 FLR 80) quoted in Re B at paragraph [63] that “There is a danger that the repeated use of [the] words will harden into a formula which, like other formula … may lead …”
Considered — I (Children: Child Assessment Order) 2020-02-28
“…Re H and Others (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563, [1996] 2 WLR 8, [1996] 1 FLR 80, where Lord Nicholls considered whether suspicion is sufficient to satisfy the threshold criteria under s.31:…”