“…n entitled to possession of it”. As entitlement to possession connotes the exclusive entitlement to occupy the property (see Brown v City of London Corporation [1996] 1 WLR 1070 at 1080 per Arden J), it is not in dispute that the tenant under a lease of a property is the “owner” for these purposes. Third, the property must be shown for…”
“…ute about the interpretation of the phrase “the person entitled to possession of” a hereditament or land in section 65(1). In Brown v City ofLondon Corporation [1996] 1 WLR 1070, the issue was whether administrative receivers of unoccupied commercial property, appointed under debentures to act as agents of the corporate mortgagors, wer…”