“…the House agreed, expressly endorsed the interpretation of s.1(3)(e) of the 1989 Act advanced by Butler-Sloss LJ in Re M and R (Minors) (Child Abuse: Evidence) [1996] 2 FLR 195. At page 203 E to G, Butler-Sloss LJ had said:…”
“…ity” of a child’s allegations, in particular to assist in the interpretation of the video recording of an ABE interview: see Re M and R (Child Abuse: Evidence) [1996] 2 FLR 195. That practice has become less common in recent years, perhaps for the reasons identified by Peter Jackson J (as he then was) in Wigan Borough Council v M and …”