How many times has [1996] STC 154 been cited?

[1996] STC 154 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1996] STC 154

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1996] STC 154

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Considered · 1

Cited — Aria Technology Ltd v Revenue And Customs 2020-02-19
“…In House (trading as P&J Autos) v Commissioners for Customs and Excise [1996] STC 154, at 162, Sir John Balcombe said:…”
Considered — Aria Technology Ltd v Revenue And Customs 2020-02-19
“…[1996] STC 154 at 162, where he said that ‘the assessment of the amount of tax considered to be due and the notification to the taxpayer are separate operations’).”…”