How many times has [1997] 1 WLR 168 been cited?

[1997] 1 WLR 168 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1997] 1 WLR 168

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1997] 1 WLR 168

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Clin v Walter Lilly & Co. Ltd 2021-02-08
“…ea consent ("CAC"). Its resolution requires consideration of the principles identified by the House of Lords in Shimizu (UK) Limited v Westminster City Council [1997] 1 WLR 168 ("Shimizu") (in the context of listed building consent).…”
Cited — Dill v The Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor 2018-11-26
“…provisions now found in the Listed Buildings Act is helpfully set out in the speech of Lord Hope of Craighead in Shimuzu (UK) Limited v Westminster CityCouncil [1997] 1 WLR 168 at page 175A-177D. For the purposes of this appeal, I can be briefer.…”