“… vary … the order” and once the term had elapsed there was no order. This argument was based in part on comments made by Ward LJ in G v G (Periodical Payments) [1998] Fam 1, at p. 16, a case in which an application for an extension had been made after the term had expired. He said:…”
“…ardson v Richardson[1994] 1 WLR 186 and it is precisely the reason it seems to me still good, despite the observations of Ward LJ in G v G (Periodical Payments)[1998] Fam 1.…”